Cream 

Where the products come from. What studies are there on the dangers of meat and dairy products that vegetarians constantly mention? What does the kindergarten give

I have met many CEOs and managers of distribution companies selling soap, shampoo, diapers, hair dyes, commercial vehicle parts, fuels and lubricants and motorcycles, hand tools (screwdrivers, files, etc.), textiles , shoes, paper, vegetable oil, rice, steel and what else.

Although each direction of distribution is absolutely convinced of its uniqueness, and the uniqueness of its problems, there are always many common topics in our discussions with them.

One of the biggest mistakes distributors make is tackling the "slow-moving" problem. Ultimately, all slow-moving goods are gradually getting rid of under the correct slogan "product line optimization".

If you are even remotely connected with the distribution industry, you are familiar with this persistent problem, so I want to ask you a simple problem:

Some people say A is slow and B is hot.

Now let me tell you that the information I gave you is not enough to answer!

The missing information is that the stock of item A is about 50 units, and the stock of item B is about 1000 units.

Well, which one is slow-moving? Obviously B!

Why has the picture changed? Is it bad that "only" 50 units of A are being sold a week? (Maybe this is his entire market.) And you are willing to give up product B because it is a slow-moving product?

Most likely, the distributor is not bothered by the sale of 50 units of A per week (as long as his share contribution or the passage in TOC language) is positive. What worries him is that every day he sees shelves (or reports in his program, depending on whether he is in a warehouse or sitting in a cozy office) with a huge stock of B.

So how do you convert a slow-moving item to a hot one?

So-called slow-moving products are self-created because purchases of that product exceed their sales rate. Since we can create a slow-moving product, we can prevent it from happening. Any product can be hot as long as the sales to inventory ratio (also known as inventory turnover) is high for that product.

The question is, why is this simple logic not accepted in most companies? This is due to the fact that in these companies the movement of stocks is not based on pulling, but on pushing to the market. If we push out stocks, we get very high stock levels for some SKUs (relative to the rate of sales) and too low stocks for others.

We can achieve high turnover of all SKUs only if we have a pull distribution system or, in other words, a rapid replenishment system that can respond to fluctuations in demand in very short time horizons. The system should have a built-in automatic blocking mechanism that reduces or stops the purchase of a specific SKU when the demand for it falls. The Theory of Constraints solution helps to align the rate of stock flow throughout the supply chain with the rate of actual demand at the end point of sales.

Now I hear: "This is the whole theory!"

I agree, this is theory and very good. By the way, did you know that in order for a hypothesis to be called a theory, it has to repeatedly pass specially designed fail tests? This means that there really is nothing more practical than a good theory.

I got a little distracted. Let me repeat the caveats of many managers in the distribution industry:

  1. We cannot implement a pull system because our sales will decline.
  2. Is it applicable in our industry?
  3. Are there examples of successful implementation in our region?

The first caveat leads to a new discussion about the paradigm shift: "The more you push, the less you sell." Can't you believe this new paradigm? What if I prove it to you?

I must describe this paradigm in more detail, and also discuss the other two caveats. I would encourage you to start by reading my article “How to Grow Sales while Cutting Inventory in Half” to understand the complete solution.

4 answers

Not too lazy and googled for you: A large study by a group of physiologists from the Harvard School of Public Health, led by M.D. Nan Pan, showed that the fears of vegetarians are absolutely justified: consumption of red meat is clearly correlated with a higher risk of death from cardiovascular disease. some types of cancer and metabolic diseases, and replacing mammalian meat with fish and poultry, on the contrary, significantly reduces this risk. In their analysis of the long-term effects of a meat-based diet, En Pan and his colleagues relied on a statistical study of an impressive scale: a total of 37,698 men and 83,644 women took part in the study, whose health, along with diet, was monitored for 28 years in the second group. and 22 years old in the first. During this time, 23,926 deaths were recorded in the two surveyed groups, of which 5910 were from cardiovascular diseases and 9464 from cancer.

The study found that in total, lifespan dropped by 13% with a daily serving of freshly cooked meat just under the palm of your hand and by as much as 20% with a daily serving of pre-cooked meat - one hot dog or two strips of bacon. For diseases that caused death in both groups, the dependence of risks on consumption of red meat was as follows: the risk of cardiovascular diseases increased by 18% and 21% for fresh and processed meat, respectively, and cancer - by 10% and 16%.



Lyon, France, October 2015.









www.thelancet.com
sci-hub.cc
monographs.iarc.fr
www.facebook.com
www.facebook.com





www.wcrf.org

WHO / IARC. Assessment of consumption of red meat and meat products: www.who.int
WHO / IARC. Questions and answers about the carcinogenicity of red meat and meat products: www.who.int

Virtually none. However, do not rush to put cons, but first read to the end. You can also express your views on this matter, I will discuss it with pleasure.

Briefly: the article, about which Leska speaks, is doubtful, WHO does not recommend becoming vegetarians, and the harm of meat specifically is poorly understood.

The "Chinese study" is what can rightfully be called complete nonsense. Expanded Scientific Critique: https://youtu.be/TKD5XEm1TtA

There is a report by the International Agency for Research on Cancer http://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/pr/2015/pdfs/pr240_E.pdf, where we read: "red meat as probably carcinogenic to humans" - "red meat, possibly carcinogenic to humans. " We pay attention to the word "possible", i.e. is not a fact.

It also mentions the carcinogenicity of processed meat. Processed meats include bacon, sausages, hot dogs, salami, corned beef, beef and ham jerky, and canned meats and meat based on sauces. Now tell me, how many of you didn't know that hot dogs are bad? There is no problem to eliminate them from your diet. True, here you can cite research on how positive emotions affect life expectancy. Here's a new challenge for you, vegans: to measure the harm of processed meat, taking into account the positive emotions that it brings. Of course, it doesn't bring it to everyone, there are exceptions everywhere, but that's another question.

But The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC, International Agency for Research on Cancer) has it. Since when is it the same thing? Substitution of concepts again?

An interesting WHO quote from the meat carcinogenicity page is worth noting here: http://www.who.int/features/qa/cancer-red-meat/en/

"22. Should we be vegetarians?

Vegetarian diets and diets that include meat have different advantages and disadvantages for health. However, this evaluation did not directly compare health risks in vegetarians and people who eat meat. That type of comparison is difficult because these groups can be different in other ways besides their consumption of meat ".

My translation is as follows, you can suggest your own:

"22. Should we be vegetarians?"

Vegetarian and meat-based diets have various health benefits and drawbacks. However, this assessment does not directly compare the health risks among vegetarians and those who eat meat. This type of comparison is difficult as these groups may be different in other ways besides their meat consumption. "

In other words, to assess the risk of cancer from meat directly, it is necessary to take into account not only nutrition, but also the ecology, genetics, lifestyle, even the rhythm of life (for example, nervous tension), etc. In any case, the WHO does not say that we need to become vegetarians.

And now about Leska's answer

World Cancer Research Foundation and American Institute for Cancer Research (WCRF / AICR) lifestyle and dietary guidelines:
Animal products.
Limit your consumption of red meat, avoid eating canned meat:
- the average consumption of red meat among the population should not be more than 300g (11 ounces) per week, and much less if it has been canned / processed.
- people who consume red meat (beef, pork, lamb) should eat no more than 500g (18 ounces) per week, and much less if it has been canned (smoking, salting, drying, adding chemical compounds for canning).
www.wcrf.org

Published by The Lancet Oncology on October 26, 2015.
The International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) / World Health Organization (WHO) have evaluated the carcinogenicity of consumption of red and processed meat.
Lyon, France, October 2015.
“The working group has classified the consumption of processed meat as a 'human carcinogen' and is listed as a group 1 carcinogen based on sufficient evidence for colorectal cancer. In addition, positive associations with consumption meat products have been found for stomach cancer. Similarly, the working group classified the consumption of red meat as a "probable human carcinogen" and is listed in group 2A carcinogenic substances. During the analysis, the working group took into account all known relevant data, including significant epidemiological studies showing a positive association between red meat consumption and colorectal cancer, with strong mechanistic evidence. Red meat consumption is also positively associated with pancreatic and prostate cancer.
A working group of 22 scientists, from 10 countries, has evaluated more than 800 epidemiological studies that investigated the relationship of cancer with the consumption of red meat or meat products.
Red meat refers to the muscles of mammals such as beef, veal, pork, lamb, horse, goat or minced meat including frozen, consumed cooked. Processed meat refers to meat that has been salted, smoked, hardened (cured meat) or subjected to other processing processes to improve taste or increase the storage time, preservation. Meat products containing pork or beef but also other red meat, poultry, organ meats (such as liver), or organ meats such as blood.
Red meat contains a large amount of proteins of biological importance, important trace elements such as B vitamins, iron (free iron and heme iron), zinc. The fat content of red meat varies by species, diet, age, sex and breed. Meat processing such as curing (jerky) and smoking produces carcinogenic chemicals, including N-nitroso compounds (NOCs), polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs), heterocyclic aromatic amines (HAAs). High temperature cooking of meat such as frying, grilling, barbecuing produces the highest amounts of these chemicals.
Depending on the country, the proportion of the population consuming red meat in the world ranges from less than 5%, up to 100%, and for processed meat, from less than 2% to 65%. For those who consume red meat in the world, the average consumption is around 50-100g per person per day, with a higher consumption level of over 200g per person per day.
Of great concern is evidence from 14 large epidemiological cohort studies that red meat consumption is positively associated with colorectal cancer. Positive associations were seen in the high versus lower red meat consumption groups in half of these studies, including cohorts from 10 European countries covering a wide range of meat consumption and in other large cohorts in Sweden and Australia. Of 15 informative case-control studies, seven reported positive associations of colorectal cancer with a high intake of red meat. Positive associations of colorectal cancer with meat consumption were reported in 12 of 18 cohort studies from Europe, Japan, and the United States. Supporting evidence came from 69 informative case-control studies. Meta-analyzes of colorectal cancer studies in 10 cohort studies reported a statistically significant dose-response relationship, with a 17% increase in risk per 100g per day of red meat and an 18% increase in the risk of colorectal cancer when consuming 50g per day of processed meat.
Positive association data were also available for more than 15 other cancers. Positive associations have been seen in group and case-control studies between red meat consumption and pancreatic cancer, prostate cancer, and between meat consumption and stomach cancer.
On the basis of a large body of data, supported by studies in various populations, combining the finding of a positive association of meat consumption with colorectal cancer, the chance of bias is unlikely. Most of the researchers in the working group concluded that there is ample evidence of carcinogenicity in the consumption of processed meat. The chance of error cannot be ruled out with the same degree of certainty for the data on consumption of red meat alone, as there was no clear association in several high-quality studies in which it is difficult to rule out mixing with other diets and lifestyle risks. The working group ruled that there is limited evidence of the carcinogenicity of consuming red meat only. Likewise, there is sufficient evidence in experimental animals for the carcinogenicity of consumption of red meat and processed meat. In rats fed colon cancer initiators and low calcium diets containing either red meat or processed meat, the incidence of precancerous colon lesions is increased. Evidence of carcinogenicity was assessed as moderate to high for red meat and processed meat, mainly in the gastrointestinal tract. A meta-analysis published in 2013 reported a moderate but statistically significant association between consumption of red or processed meat and an adenoma (precancerous lesion) in the colon and rectum, which was consistent across studies. For genotoxicity and oxidative stress, the evidence was moderate for consumption of red or processed meat. In humans, observational data showed small but statistically significant associations with APC gene mutation or promoter methylation, which were identified in 75 (43%) and 41 (23%) of 185 archived colon and rectal cancer specimens, respectively. In three interventional studies in humans, changes in markers of oxidative stress were associated with consumption of red meat or meat products. Substantial support for mechanistic evidence was available for several meat components such as N-nitroso compounds (NOCs), heme iron, and heterocyclic aromatic amines (HAAs). The consumption of red meat and processed meat in humans induces the formation of NOC in the colon. High consumption of red meat (300 or 420 g / day) increased levels of suspected NOC-derived DNA adducts in exfoliated colonocytes or rectal biopsies in two interventional studies. Heme iron mediates the formation of NOC and lipid oxidation products in the gastrointestinal tract of humans and rodents. Meat processed at high temperatures contains heterocyclic aromatic amines (HAA). GAA are genotoxic, the degree of genotoxicity is greater in humans than in rodents. Meat smoked or cooked on a hot surface or open flame contains polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs). These chemicals cause DNA damage, but there is currently little direct evidence that this occurs as a result of meat consumption.
Overall, the working group classified the consumption of processed meat as a "human carcinogen" and was listed as carcinogenic group 1 on the basis of sufficient evidence for colorectal cancer. In addition, positive associations with meat consumption were found for stomach cancer. the group classified red meat consumption as a "probable human carcinogen" and is listed as carcinogenic group 2A In the analysis, the working group took into account all relevant data, including significant epidemiological studies showing a positive association between red meat consumption and colorectal cancer and strong mechanistic evidence Consumption of red meat is also positively associated with pancreatic and prostate cancer.

Individuals who want to lose weight or watch their weight are interested in products that would allow them not to get fat. Such options exist in nature. These include fruits, vegetables and herbs. Knowing these foods can help you balance your diet and improve your well-being. Regular consumption allows you to prolong life and not clog the body with unnecessary substances.

The concept of "foods with negative calorie content" is arbitrary. There are mythical ideas about them. In fact, it is customary to call such substances that:

  • contain a small amount of bound energy;
  • digested for a long time or improve bowel function;
  • spend more energy on assimilation than they give to the body;
  • accelerate metabolism, which creates the effect of rapid weight loss.

There are no dishes or ingredients that have a negative calorie value. Any food has energy. Negative calorie content is observed in foods with an average of 25–35 kcal per 100 g. Taking this fact into account, it is necessary to make a diet for those who care about their weight.

Before you actively include useful helpers in your own diet, you need to:

  • balance the menu for protein and other carbohydrates for energy and muscle development;
  • make sure there are no allergies;
  • determine the time of the meal. The recommended number of snacks is 5-6 times a day.

Foods to include in your diet

Negative calorie foods usually belong to the group of vegetables and fruits. Their main advantage is the high content of fiber, which is not absorbed by the body and perfectly cleanses the intestines. These properties are possessed by:

  • green vegetables;
  • citrus;
  • some exotic fruits;
  • tuberous vegetables.

A table will help to remember and guide these products. Additionally, useful types of berries and herbs are included.

On the Internet, you can find an expanded table offering a list of foods that will help in the fight against extra pounds. Their list is wide enough. Preparing dishes from the products included in the table will not be difficult even for an inexperienced housewife.

Negative Calorie Drinks

Among drinks, there are also those who will take more energy from the body than will give in return. You can drink them in large quantities throughout the day. If there are no contraindications from the work of different body systems, it is permissible to arrange drinking days. The following list will help you choose the right option:

  • green tea;
  • freshly squeezed juices from grapefruit, beets, carrots, diluted with water;
  • blooming Sally;
  • thyme and mint tea.

Additives from cinnamon (natural) and ginger can enhance the effect of drinks. You need to drink no more than 1.5 liters of such liquids per day. The exception is coffee. He has a negative calorie content, but the drink does not bring much benefit to the body. In this regard, it is better to give preference to other products from the list, for example, herbal infusion.

Ways to maintain and enhance negative calories

If vegetables and other negative calorie foods are improperly processed, enzymes or their original structure can be destroyed. This will lead to the fact that they will lose their valuable properties. It is not recommended to expose them to excessive heat treatment and long-term storage.

To make the body spend even more energy on digestion, you can do the following:

  • cool food;
  • add ice to drinks or negative calorie meals;
  • use without mixing with other substances;
  • consume everything mainly in the morning;
  • chew food slowly;
  • do not drink anything you eat for 30-40 minutes.

Even the usual additives in the form of oil to vegetable salads or honey for drinks can change the absorption of calories. Steamers or grilling food in the microwave can improve the taste ready meals without losing their value.

All rules and recommendations are aimed at a healthy person. If you have health problems, a tendency to diabetes, you should additionally consult a doctor. In the absence of allergies, even adding fresh herbs to the diet will be an excellent incentive for the body to burn calories faster. It is important to remember that a portion of even foods with a negative energy balance should be no more than 500 grams per meal.

Parting. Having received the news that my wife was leaving for her parents, I went through: - denial (it cannot be that she left); - anger (how can you leave me alone ?!); - bidding (she cannot stay, no, even if I stop throwing socks for it); - depression (I am lonely and no one needs it). I admitted that for seven whole days I would have to lead a bachelor life in a bachelor's apartment.

Questions
Closing the door behind the faithful, I realized that parting was parting, and lunch was on schedule. The last time I had to survive on my own was in my student years. Then it was possible to interrupt with daily dumplings, and for the holidays to cook pasta with stew. But what do bachelors eat when they are no longer young and the stomach can no longer digest the bearing?

It turned out that the bachelor's refrigerator does not generate any notes. And where can I get a list of products? I’m beginning to think that all these letters on the fridge didn’t appear by themselves. Internet searches have generated more questions than answers. Why must there be 6 kiwis in a bachelor's apartment? Why do I need tomato paste if I can buy ketchup? What to do with gelatin?

Where do the products come from?
The list has been compiled, all the surpluses like a new drill have been crossed out, a whole case of beer has been taken into account for a week (on Wednesday we play football, and on weekends we play hockey, you know). In general, the bank's family budget. But where do you go with this list? When I was in a popular store for the first letter of the alphabet, I realized that it was better not to repeat this. I understood a lot then. If you think that it is difficult to fight for a piece of a tiny cake for the whole office, then you have not tried to get a sausage at a discount. If you think that there are boors, teapots and traffic jams on the roads in Moscow, walk with a cart along the endless rows of this store. Supermarkets within walking distance do not take so much time and nerves, but there is not much choice there either. And I want to eat tasty and varied. The wife says that we only eat healthy, so I'm used to certain brands and varieties that are not in every Four or Six.

A miracle happened - each saved the other!
Having reached a dead end, I went to a neighbor. I have a young guy on top without a permanent woman, he looks plump. I asked him whether he has such a healthy complexion from dumplings or does he have enough salary in restaurants to eat every day? It turned out that he cooks himself. Okay, in our age of multicooker and video tutorials on YouTube, I can believe this. But the fact that an active young man with a 5/2 job spends the whole evening at the grocery store is sorry. Opening a full refrigerator, he told - in groceries he happens from time to time and only for emotional impulses. Falling to my knees, I prayed: “Seryoga! Teach me, master! " And then a new world opened up in front of me.

Answer
It turned out that I, too, can not go to the store - at work I send the list, and in the evening I and the groceries go to my house. Well that is we go, of course, separately, but we meet at my place. Or I sit down to watch hockey and understand that after ours fight the Canadians, I will need pancakes with maple syrup to fully celebrate the victory. But I don't run to the nearest store (have you ever seen maple syrup in the nearest store?). I just get both microwave pancakes and syrup straight home!

And then the world community lurked in anticipation of the disclosure of the secret. Perhaps I will disappoint the most impressionable, but this is not magic and not the eighth wonder of the world (although I would argue with that). It turned out that there is grocery delivery to your home and instamart.ru deals with it (Seryoga says that it is better to take from them, and Seryoga in such matters I believe), this is an online grocery store in Moscow. In addition, the first delivery is free - it's a sin not to try it. In fact, there is not only food, but almost the entire range of Metro, but let the wife do this when she returns.

I lived with Instamart so well and freely that I climbed several steps in the pyramid of needs at once, stopped thinking about survival and began to make a plan for how to please my wife when she returns. What is the best gift? That's right, hand-made. And also the one that will show that I can now do better than her in the kitchen. And I remembered how she set the table for the holidays. Salads, hot, dessert - she'll be surprised!

Surprise
A short search made me the owner of a book of her recipes with marked favorite dishes, there is also a list of products for ordering. While they were driving, I called a taxi to her train - I will meet her at home, at the festive table.

In the process of cooking, it turned out that I couldn't do better in the kitchen. And in general, this is a dangerous place. In the microwave, a cannonball of eggs is heard, the grater rips the skin off the fingers, the mustard stains the last pair of clean socks, the boiling brew from the saucepan is poured onto the stove. Guys, take our word for it, there is no need to try to cook like a wife, we cannot do it! And if you do, then make sure that there is a plaster and iodine at home.

Do not part with your loved ones
Everything ended well - I survived and even set a nice table. My wife said that everything was delicious (she is very polite with me), and I brought a pre-prepared bouquet, knelt down in front of her and told her how much I missed her and how the house immediately became brighter with her arrival. And this is not because I never want to cook myself anymore, I just love her.

P.s. it turned out that his wife had already heard about Instamart, so it was not possible to surprise her. But how a real man, I was the first to explore this service and put purchases on stream. For which I am grateful, and my wife - a few extra free hours a week.

    What foods contain hormones
    Our body is protected from many harmful substances that enter it with food (such as harmful nutritional supplements) - it can neutralize and remove a small amount of harmful substances before they have time to cause serious harm to health. But we are defenseless against hormones in food!
    You can find out what additives are present in a particular product - it is written on the packaging. The presence of hormones in food is not reported anywhere.
    Therefore, it is so important to know which foods contain hormones.
    To answer this question, let's figure it out:
    Where do the hormones in foods come from?
    what hormones are in foods?
    which hormones from food have an effect on the human body, and which do not?
    Where do hormones in foods come from?
    Hormones are used in animal husbandry and fisheries:
    o when raising animals for meat,
    o to increase the weight of fish and change sex,
    o to increase milk yield,
    o in the production of eggs.
    When growing plants, hormones (plant sex hormones) are also used to accelerate the ripening of fruits and vegetables.
    Plants also contain phytohormones - substances that exhibit some of the properties of human hormones.
    What hormones are found in foods?
    Hormones are not completely destroyed when foods are cooked. Therefore, all the hormones initially present in meat, milk, eggs, vegetables and fruits remain there, at least sometimes in smaller doses. Steroid hormones are least destroyed by heat treatment. As a result, the following types of hormones are contained in food:
    Male and female hormones are found in meat (beef, pork, chicken).
    Female hormones are found in milk and eggs.
    Thyrostatics are drugs that interfere with the production of thyroid hormone. Contained in meat.
    The sex hormones of plants are found in vegetables and fruits.
    Phytoharmonics - The phytoestrogen found in soy is the most famous. Other phytohormones are found mainly in medicinal herbs.
    Which hormones from food have an effect on the human body and which do not?
    The sex hormones of animals are identical to those of humans. Thyrostatics too. Thus, all hormones used in animal husbandry are capable of influencing the human body. Getting into the human body with food (meat, milk, chicken eggs), these hormones are perceived by them as their own.
    The sex hormones of plants used to accelerate the ripening of vegetables and fruits or to change the sex of a plant do not affect the human body in any way.
    The effect of phytoestrogen and other phytohormones on humans depends on many different factors. In some cases, phytohormones can be helpful. On the other hand, they can cause serious health damage. In practice, phytohormones are hormonal drugs and should be treated with great caution. We will analyze this issue in more detail in a separate article on phytohormones.
    Summing up, we can say that almost all hormones contained in animal and plant products, except for the sex hormones of plants, affect a person.
    Now we are ready to answer the question asked at the beginning of this article - which foods contain hormones?
    Hormones that can harm our health are found in the following foods:
    in meat (in beef, pork, chicken, etc.),
    in milk and dairy products,
    in eggs,
    in soybeans and products made from soybeans.
    No harmful hormones are found in the following foods:
    in vegetables, fruits, cereals and others herbal products, except for soybeans,
    in the meat of animals raised without the use of hormones (in the village),
    in eggs from village chickens,
    in milk from a country cow.
    A controversial issue is the harm to fish grown with the use of hormones.

    Hormones in meat
    The scale at which meat is produced is enormous. If all these cows, pigs and chickens, before going to the slaughterhouse, grazed in the meadow for years, gaining weight naturally, there would simply be no room for people on earth. And this is not an exaggeration, but rather an understatement.
    In reality, many farm animals intended for meat spend their entire lives in cages and pens. Cows usually spend only a few months in the fields and then end up in feedlots. Calves, piglets, chickens are slaughtered at a very early age ... only they weigh quite a bit at the time of slaughter.
    Hormones in meat:
    Why are hormones used in raising animals for meat?
    What hormones are used in raising animals for meat?
    Why are hormones in meat dangerous?
    How to get rid of hormones in meat and meat products?
    Why are hormones used in raising animals for meat?
    Every kilogram of meat is money. Everything is very simple: the faster the animal gains the required weight, the less costs will be required for its maintenance, and the higher the profit will be.
    How do you get an animal to gain unnaturally large weight in an unnaturally short time? First, animals are locked in cramped cages where they cannot move. As a result, energy is not spent on movement - everything goes into mass gain. Due to lack of movement, the muscles atrophy and the meat becomes soft. Feeding animals unnatural food containing proteins in the form of bone meal, for example. But all this would not be enough if hormones did not exist.
    What hormones are used in raising animals for meat?
    In Europe and Russia, the use of hormones in animal husbandry is prohibited, but ... no one checks the observance of this prohibition. Is the ban on the use of hormones enforced? It is unlikely - the gain is too great. In America, hormones are legal. Mainly female and male sex hormones are used. Female hormones can be administered to males and male hormones to females. The result is animals of the "middle" sex, which quickly gain unnaturally large weight.
    Here are some of the hormones used in animal husbandry:
    The female sex hormone estrodiol and its synthetic analogue. The hormone estrodiol has a strong feminizing effect.
    The pregnancy hormone progesterone and its synthetic analogue. This hormone prepares the body for pregnancy and gestation - it increases appetite and slows down the movement of food through the digestive tract to enable the body to absorb more nutrients.
    The male sex hormone testosterone and its synthetic analogue. The hormone testosterone promotes muscle growth.
    Why are hormones in meat dangerous?
    Female and male sex hormones (estradiol and testosterone), as well as the pregnancy hormone progesterone, used in raising animals for meat, are identical to humans. These hormones act on humans in the same way as on animals.
    Here is a rough list of hormone-related problems:
    Hormones are carcinogenic - they can lead to breast and prostate cancer).
    Hormones can disrupt hormonal balance.
    Hormones cause allergies and other autoimmune diseases.
    Hormones interfere with reproductive function in both men and women.
    During pregnancy, hormones cause disturbances in the development of the fetus.
    Hormones are especially dangerous for children and adolescents.
    How to get rid of hormones in meat and meat products?
    It is believed that by boiling the chicken and draining the first broth, you can get rid of most of the harmful substances. On the other hand, I have not found a single study on whether it is possible to get rid of hormones in meat in this way. I tend to agree with the opinion of those who believe that hormones remain where they were.
    What to do for those who do not live in the village and do not raise chickens on their own, without the use of hormones and other chemicals? The only way out is to cut down on meat consumption. Since it is impossible to remove excess hormones from food that have entered our body, nor to neutralize their effect.
    Harmful fish?

    I'll tell you right away that I eat fish. I don’t eat meat, milk and eggs, but I do eat fish. However, there are many hormone-reared fish on the market that are also dyed (since farmed fish have a pale hue, they are often dyed to resemble fish caught in the sea). The harm of artificially tinted fish is beyond doubt. But is fish grown with hormones harmful?
    Indeed, hormones are used in fish farming. Let's see what hormones are used for and is fish grown in this way harmful?
    1. Hormonal injections are often used to stimulate maturation in females. Is this fish harmful?
    In this case, the offspring grown from the eggs of the stimulated female is no different from the usual one. There is no need to talk about the dangers of such fish due to hormones.
    2. Application of feed with hormones for sex reversal of fish. Is this fish harmful?
    In fish, sex is not determined at the time of fertilization of eggs. In the early stages of development, it is possible to change the sex of the fish.
    What is it for? In some fish species (such as carp and salmon), females grow faster than males. And in other species (for example, in catfish), males overtake females in growth. Accordingly, in fish farms they prefer to breed mainly female carp and salmon and male catfish. To obtain a predominantly female fish population, female hormones are used - estrogens. And, if you want to increase the percentage of males, then use male hormones - androgens.
    Sex hormones act only for a certain, rather short period. There is no sense in the further use of hormones. Thus, artificially sex-altered fish do not contain any additional hormones.
    3. Application of hormones to accelerate growth. Is this fish harmful?
    I have not found reliable information on the use of hormones to accelerate the growth of fish. However, it is possible that such a practice exists. If any hormones are applied during the entire period of fish farming, then it is obvious that such fish will be harmful.
    4. Is fish caught in the sea and fresh water harmful?
    Marine and freshwater fish can contain mercury, heavy metals, radioactive substances and organochlorine compounds that are carcinogenic. Therefore, although these fish are not raised with hormones, they can be more harmful than those raised in artificial reservoirs.
    Hormones and dairy products

    How much milk does a modern breeding dairy cow produce? At least 10 times more than is needed to feed a calf. The performance of a dairy cow is only 30% dependent on genetics. The rest 70% comes from feeding. This amount of milk cannot be produced on natural plant food for herbivores. Therefore, high-calorie feed is used, with various artificial additives, wastes from the fishing industry and bone meal, which cause digestive and metabolic disorders in cows. But milk yield can be increased by another 40% - by adding synthetic growth hormones.
    Hormones and dairy products
    What hormones are found in milk and dairy products?
    The effect of dairy products on human growth hormone.
    The danger of increased levels of growth hormone.
    What hormones are found in milk and dairy products?
    In 1993, the FDA approved recombinant bovine growth hormone (rGHR), a synthetic bovine hormone (injected into dairy cows) that stimulates milk production, and consumer groups are still concerned about it.
    By itself, the rCGR hubbub has no noticeable effect on human health. The real concern is that manipulating bovine growth hormones could increase another hormone, insulin-like growth factor (IGF), which can mimic human growth hormone in dangerous proportions. In practice, studies have shown that milk from cows inoculated with the hormone rGHR contains ten times more IGF than milk from cows not inoculated with this hormone.
    The effect of dairy products on human growth hormone.
    While consuming large amounts of milk and other dairy products has been associated with an increase in human IGF levels in the blood, this increase may not be a direct result of animal IGF or IGF levels found in these foods. This is because the amount of IGF in dairy products - whether they come from cows vaccinated with rCGR or not - is nothing compared to the natural amount of IGF in your body.
    “Just to get your daily amount of IGF from your saliva and gastrointestinal tract, you have to drink about 95 liters of milk,” says Terry Etherton, Ph.D., professor of milk technology and animal science at Pennsylvania State University and author of the food biotechnology blog ...
    So if the amount of IGF in milk is negligible, then how does milk consumption increase our IGF? As Dr. Willett explains, milk in general (and it contains proteins, sugar, minerals, and other hormones) can somehow influence the human body to produce its own IGF.
    The danger of increased levels of growth hormone.
    High blood levels of IGF (whatever the cause) have been linked to an increased risk of breast, prostate, and other cancers in humans. In a 2004 study, patients with above-average IGF levels were 50 percent more likely to develop prostate cancer and 65 percent more likely to develop hormone-dependent breast cancer in the pre-menopausal period than those with below-average levels of this hormone. ...
    According to Walter Willett, MD, director of nutrition at the Harvard School of Public Health in Boston, many factors (including genes, smoking, and fat intake) contribute to cancer, but “it is possible that at least some of that risk is related with IGF levels ”, especially where prostate cancer occurs.
    In conclusion, I want to add that since milk is intended for babies, it itself contains growth hormones. These hormones are essential for a growing body, but can be dangerous for an adult. Growth hormones found in dairy products can stimulate the growth of malignant cells.
    The article was written using materials from the site mixednews.ru.

    Material taken from the site http://health4ever.org/